Skip to content

[Payment due @mkhutornyi] Vendor matching CC - R1: App Phase 2 (Default vendor row)#91880

Merged
marcochavezf merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
beaman-vendor-matching-r1-app-phase-2
Jun 7, 2026
Merged

[Payment due @mkhutornyi] Vendor matching CC - R1: App Phase 2 (Default vendor row)#91880
marcochavezf merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
beaman-vendor-matching-r1-app-phase-2

Conversation

@Beamanator

@Beamanator Beamanator commented May 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Phase 2 of Vendor matching CC - R1: App — adds the workspace-admin "Default vendor" row in QBO Company Card export settings for Credit/Debit-card export destinations. Mirrors the existing Vendor Bill default-vendor flow.

The new row appears in DynamicQuickbooksCompanyCardExpenseAccountPage whenever hasVendorFeature(policy, isBetaEnabled(BETAS.VENDOR_MATCHING)) is true — i.e., the workspace has the vendorMatching beta enabled AND QBO is connected with nonReimbursableExpensesExportDestination set to CREDIT_CARD or DEBIT_CARD. Tapping the row navigates to a new QuickbooksNonReimbursableCreditCardDefaultVendorSelectPage (RHP), which lets the admin pick a vendor from connections.qbo.data.vendors; selection calls the updateQuickbooksOnlineNonReimbursableCreditCardDefaultVendor action shipped in Phase 1.

Why this looks small

Three pieces of the original Phase 2 plan have been intentionally deferred:

  1. Policy.areVendorsEnabled + MORE_FEATURES.ARE_VENDORS_ENABLED + locked More Features card — verified that neither Auth nor Web-Expensify has a server-side areVendorsEnabled policy NVP today (only the transaction-level vendor NVP from the Auth foundation PR) and the PHP fuzzy matcher in the Web-Expensify commands and event hooks PR gates on BETA_VENDOR_MATCHING + QBO config alone, not on any per-workspace toggle. Adding the App-side toggle would be pure UI state with no server-side enforcement — would need a coordinated Auth + Web-E change first. Until that lands, the right gate is hasVendorFeature(policy, beta) (existing from Phase 1), which is what this PR consumes. The Vendors More Features card itself can be added in a future PR alongside the server-toggle work if/when the design calls for it.
  2. Vendors tab in workspace navigation — read-only display of the imported QBO vendor list. Substantial nav/route/linking-config boilerplate; better landed alongside the Phase 3 expense-flow work where there's a clear user need for browsing the vendor list (the vendor selector RHP).
  3. Two pushTransactionViolationsOnyxData callers (export-type change + vendor-list sync) — selectExportCompanyCard uses the generic updateManyPolicyConnectionConfigs and atomically writes three fields in one API call, so threading the violation push into that flow requires either refactoring out of the generic helper or introducing a vendor-specific wrapper action. The vendor-list sync (callsite 2) has no existing hook pattern (no Onyx subscriber or server-push currently). Since zero workspaces are on the vendorMatching beta today and the client-side violation recompute happens lazily on any next transaction edit, the cost-of-delay is essentially nil. Worth handling properly in a focused Phase 2b PR rather than rushed here.

The Phase 1 PR description called Phase 2 "workspace settings". This PR delivers the Default vendor settings — the only piece that doesn't require new server coordination, an Onyx subscriber, or a nav-config diff bigger than the actual logic.

Cross-PR dependencies

  • Auth foundation PR (merged + deployed) — provides the UpdateMoneyRequestVendor command + inactiveVendor violation type. Not consumed by this PR directly, but the App Phase 1 PR consumed it.
  • Web-Expensify commands and event hooks PR (merged, deployed) — contains the UpdateQuickbooksOnlineNonReimbursableCreditCardDefaultVendor PHP wrapper command this PR's UI will call. Until that deploys, the row renders and lets admins pick a vendor, but the API write will return a not-found-command error on prod.

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/638653

PROPOSAL: N/A (internal feature, no external proposal)

Tests

Prerequisite: a workspace with the vendorMatching beta enabled, QBO connected, and non-reimbursable export destination set to either Credit Card or Debit Card.

  1. Open the workspace's Settings > Accounting. Click Connections > QuickBooks Online > Export > Company card expenses.
  2. Verify the new Default vendor menu row appears below the existing "Export as" + account rows.
  3. Verify the row's title shows the current default-vendor name (or is blank when none is set).
  4. Tap the row. Verify it navigates to the new "Default vendor" RHP select page.
  5. Pick a vendor from the list. Verify the RHP closes, the row's title updates to the picked vendor name, and the value persists across navigation.
  6. Flip the export destination to Vendor Bill (back on the previous page). Verify the new CC/DC default vendor row disappears.
  7. Flip the export destination back to Credit Card or Debit Card. Verify the row reappears with the previously-set value preserved.
  8. With the vendorMatching beta disabled on the workspace, verify the row is hidden regardless of export destination.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests, executed with the network disabled after step 1. Verify the row renders from cached Onyx state and that selecting a vendor surfaces the standard offline pending-action indicator (the same OfflineWithFeedback wrapping the existing Vendor Bill default-vendor row).

QA Steps

Same as Tests, but requires vendorMatching beta enablement on the QA workspace. The row has no end-user-visible effect outside of QBO admin workspace settings, so QA scope is limited to verifying the row's visibility branches and that the select-and-save round-trip lands on the workspace config.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I verified that similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
  • I verified that all props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
  • I verified that each file is named correctly
  • I verified that each component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
  • I verified that the only data being stored in component state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
  • In component if we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
  • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
  • I verified that component internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
  • I verified that all JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
  • I verified that each component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions

Screenshots/Videos

To be added once a local build is up — the row is structurally identical across platforms (single MenuItemWithTopDescription + RHP SelectionScreen) so platform-specific captures will be uniform.

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Mirrors the existing Vendor Bill default vendor flow, gated by the
`vendorMatching` beta + QBO Credit/Debit-card export config so the
row only appears for workspaces where the Phase 1 fuzzy matcher can
actually use it. Uses the `updateQuickbooksOnlineNonReimbursableCreditCardDefaultVendor`
action shipped in Phase 1 (#91235).
@codecov

codecov Bot commented May 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/SCREENS.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
...gation/linkingConfig/RELATIONS/WORKSPACE_TO_RHP.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/libs/Navigation/linkingConfig/config.ts 76.92% <ø> (ø)
...gation/AppNavigator/ModalStackNavigators/index.tsx 6.52% <0.00%> (-0.42%) ⬇️
...ickbooksNonReimbursableDefaultVendorSelectPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...nReimbursableCreditCardDefaultVendorSelectPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/ROUTES.ts 20.32% <20.00%> (+2.52%) ⬆️
...DynamicQuickbooksCompanyCardExpenseAccountPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...port/QuickbooksNonReimbursableVendorSelectPage.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 333 files with indirect coverage changes

@Beamanator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Chef's kiss.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

@Beamanator Beamanator requested a review from mkhutornyi June 4, 2026 18:54
@Beamanator Beamanator marked this pull request as ready for review June 4, 2026 18:54
@Beamanator Beamanator requested review from a team as code owners June 4, 2026 18:54
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and ZhenjaHorbach and removed request for a team June 4, 2026 18:54
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ZhenjaHorbach Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team June 4, 2026 18:54
@Beamanator Beamanator removed the request for review from ZhenjaHorbach June 4, 2026 18:55
@Beamanator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

thanks for volunteering to help review & test here @mkhutornyi !

};

function QuickbooksNonReimbursableCreditCardDefaultVendorSelectPage({policy}: WithPolicyConnectionsProps) {
const {translate} = useLocalize();

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-3 (docs)

This new page is nearly identical to QuickbooksNonReimbursableDefaultVendorSelectPage.tsx. The only differences are:

  1. The config key used (nonReimbursableCreditCardDefaultVendor vs nonReimbursableBillDefaultVendor)
  2. The update action called (updateQuickbooksOnlineNonReimbursableCreditCardDefaultVendor vs updateQuickbooksOnlineNonReimbursableBillDefaultVendor)

All other logic (vendor list mapping, selection handling, empty state, SelectionScreen configuration) is identical.

Consider extracting a shared component that accepts the config key and update action as parameters, e.g.:

function QuickbooksNonReimbursableVendorSelectPage({
    policy,
    configKey,
    updateVendor,
}: WithPolicyConnectionsProps & {
    configKey: string;
    updateVendor: (policyID: string, value: string, oldValue?: string) => void;
}) {
    // shared logic here, using configKey and updateVendor
}

Then both pages can be thin wrappers or route entries that pass the appropriate config key and action.


Reviewed at: bd829c0 | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mmm good idea, will do this but probs not today

@mkhutornyi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

i think i'll need to have your test workspace admin's email so i can add them to the beta

Please add these emails:

e4c0c7148+85836@gmail.com
e4c0c7148+91880@gmail.com

@Beamanator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

aah shoot i didn't add the beta to the supportal tool so it will be a bit till i can add you 😭

@JmillsExpensify JmillsExpensify requested review from heyjennahay and removed request for JmillsExpensify June 4, 2026 20:18
@JmillsExpensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Re-assigned to Jenna since this is her project.

@Beamanator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mkhutornyi added those emails to the vendorMatching beta! 👍

Reduces duplication between QuickbooksNonReimbursableDefaultVendorSelectPage
(Vendor Bill) and QuickbooksNonReimbursableCreditCardDefaultVendorSelectPage
(Credit/Debit card) by extracting QuickbooksNonReimbursableVendorSelectPage
parameterized by configKey + updateVendor + displayName. Both pages become
thin wrappers that wire the right config key and action; routing remains
unchanged so each entry still has its own component file.
Two QBO vendors are allowed to share a name; using the name as the React
list key caused potential collisions in SelectionScreen rendering and made
initiallyFocusedOptionKey ambiguous. vendor.id is unique and already used
as the row value. Fixes both Bill and Credit/Debit-card paths via the
shared component extracted in 2bf7d48.
The VendorConfigKey type is only used inside QuickbooksNonReimbursableVendorSelectPage
to constrain its configKey prop; no other file imports it. Knip flagged the
export as an unused type. Keep the type as a file-local declaration.
@Beamanator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

back to you @mkhutornyi 🙏

@mkhutornyi

mkhutornyi commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov

@mkhutornyi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backend sends this error:

Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 7 09 15 PM

Vendor bill works fine though.

Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 7 09 43 PM

@mkhutornyi mkhutornyi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I faced this backend issue but not blocker as this feature is in beta and frontend looks good.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from marcochavezf June 5, 2026 18:27
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@marcochavezf Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot changed the title Vendor matching CC - R1: App Phase 2 (Default vendor row) [Payment due @mkhutornyi] Vendor matching CC - R1: App Phase 2 (Default vendor row) Jun 5, 2026
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎯 @mkhutornyi, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

A payment issue will be created for your review once this PR is deployed to production.
E/E issue linked to the PR - https://www.github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/638653.

If payment is not needed (e.g., regression PR review fix etc), react with 👎 to this comment to prevent the payment issue from being created.

@Beamanator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

sounds good ya i'm working on a backend PR for this but ya this is all behind beta 👍

@Beamanator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

FYI backend PR here: https://github.com/Expensify/Auth/pull/22083

@marcochavezf marcochavezf merged commit 80f299b into main Jun 7, 2026
38 checks passed
@marcochavezf marcochavezf deleted the beaman-vendor-matching-r1-app-phase-2 branch June 7, 2026 15:28
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @marcochavezf has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Jun 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Jun 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/marcochavezf in version: 9.4.1-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 Help site review: no changes required at this time.

I reviewed the changes in this PR against the help articles under App/docs/articles. The closest existing article is Configure QuickBooks Online, whose "Export company card expenses as" section documents the Credit card / Debit card / Vendor bill destinations (and the default vendor that's available today only for Vendor bill).

I'm recommending no help site update yet because this feature isn't generally available:

  • Beta-gated. The new "Default vendor" row only renders when hasVendorFeature(policy, isBetaEnabled(CONST.BETAS.VENDOR_MATCHING)) is true. Per the PR description, zero workspaces are on the vendorMatching beta today, so no customer can see this row.
  • Backend not live on prod. The PR notes the UpdateQuickbooksOnlineNonReimbursableCreditCardDefaultVendor command must deploy first; until then the API write errors on prod. Documenting a flow that doesn't yet work end-to-end would be inaccurate.
  • Admin-only, no end-user-visible effect outside QBO workspace export settings.

Help articles describe generally-available behavior, so the right time to document the Credit/Debit card default vendor is when vendorMatching graduates from beta to GA. At that point the update is small: extend the "Export company card expenses as" section of the QBO article to note that a default vendor can also be selected for Credit card and Debit card destinations.

I did not create a draft help site PR since no changes are required right now.

@Beamanator, please confirm this assessment. If you'd prefer the QBO article updated now anyway (e.g., the beta is expected to go GA imminently), reply @MelvinBot create the help site PR and I'll open a draft.

@Beamanator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Backend sends this error:

Screenshot 2026-06-05 at 7 09 15 PM

FYI this should be fixed! Backend PR went live yesterday!

@izarutskaya

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi @Beamanator Do we need specific account for this PR? With expensifail account we don't see "Default vendor" menu row.

Prerequisite: a workspace with the vendorMatching beta enabled,

91880-Web.mp4
Recording.3804.mp4

@Beamanator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

aah shoot, yes @izarutskaya - i'd need to add the tester email account to the beta.

I'll take this QA internal actually since it should all be behind a beta - cc @heyjennahay

@Beamanator Beamanator added the InternalQA This pull request required internal QA label Jun 9, 2026
@Julesssss

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hi @Beamanator what internal QA needs to be ran here? It seems to be behind a beta so i am unblocking the checklist.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.4.1-6 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Payment issue created: #93124

@Beamanator

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

We're working on internal QA testing separately!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

InternalQA This pull request required internal QA

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants